Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Final Project Ideas


Final Project 

Prompt:

Choose three of these projects that look most interesting to you.  Do some background research and thinking: 
* learn about the organization
* the local community
* existing solutions to the problem posed
* generate a list of questions you have about the project

Create a Pugh chart comparing the different projects, and provide me in your blog with a ranked list of the projects you would like to work on.

--

My three projects: 

GrupoFenix in Nicaragua

III) develop new design for stands for solar cookers that is easier to build and more cost efficient.  The current design requires a lot of metalworking, and the tools available are insufficient for the work.  Research online should allow you to find pictures of the existing grupofenix solar cooker stand.  A stand that can be easily rotated to keep the cooker pointed to the sun during the day would be a real improvement.

Estado de Proyecto

Este breve resumen sirve para reclutar nuevos voluntarios adecuados para el proyecto.

Nombre de Proyecto: New design for Solar Cooker Stand

Colaboradores de proyecto: Solar Cooker Construction Team – Cooperative Solar Women of Totogalpa

Descripción de proyecto: To come up with a new design that is easier and more cost effective to build than the current design.

Estado actual: The current design for the stand is made out of metal.  It consists of cutting metal and drilling holes in the metal (with inadequate tools) so that they can then can then be put together to form a stand that holds the solar cooker.

Próximos pasos: To come up with a design that is less labour intensive aesthetically pleasing, uses materials locally availably and does not cost more than US$50 to build.

---

My research:

Here's an article that describes the Women of Totogalpa, who belong to the second poorest municipality (Totogalpa) in the second poorest nation of the Western hemisphere (Nicaragua).[1] Grupo Fenix was founded in 1996 by university students and their professor at the U of Managua, and is focused on researching and delivering sustainable technologies to Nicaragua. So far, they have " install[ed] solar pumps, solar drip irrigation systems, micro-hydroelectric systems, PV battery charging centers and hundreds of photovoltaic systems in rural communities. They also built solar dryers, solar water heating systems, biogas digesters, dozens of solar ovens, hundreds of photovoltaic panels and a hand full of miniature solar cars." [2] Many new organizations also arose because of their efforts. Women of Totogalpa is one of these organizations, that developed after solar cookers were brought to the area. 

The Women of Totogalpa built a solar center, a solar restaurant, host visitors from Grupo Fenix and improve their homes through a microloan program, improve solar cookers, are working on many other solar projects, established a scholarship fund for secondary education, have access to electricity (mostly solar). Details about their solar cooker: "The cooker design is based on a model originally promoted by Bill Lankford throughout Central America. It’s a box cooker on a stand with wheels so it can be moved easily. It has one reflector in the front of the cooker for easy accessibility. Throughout the years the women have been adapting the cooker to their specific needs, and constantly improving it and updating the design. The cookers, which have been used to roast coffee and cook rice, vegetables, chicken, cakes and cookies, don’t replace wood 100%, but definitely help reduce the amount of wood used for cooking, and the amount of smoke the women breathe throughout their day." [1] 

Image [1]: 


[1] http://ases.conference-services.net/resources/252/2859/pdf/SOLAR2012_0230_full%20paper.pdf
[2] http://grupofenix.org/about-us/our-story/

Research and more details on the design can be found here:
[3] http://www.saluddelsol.org/projects/solar-autoclave-progress-report-1/

My major question: This design seems to incorporate wood, not metal, and it has wheels. It could of course be improved, but is the prompt referring to a different stove?

GrupoFenix in Nicaragua

IV) develop a bio-digester that is suitable for household use in the community.

Estado de Proyecto

Este breve resumen sirve para reclutar nuevos voluntarios adecuados para el proyecto.

Nombre de Proyecto: Biodiogestor

Colaboradores de proyecto: Solar Center

Descripción de proyecto: To design a biodigestor that will work in the reality of Sabana Grande

Estado actual: Currently there are two examples of biodigestors in the community of Sabana Grande.  One that is located at the Green Energy Restaurant “La Casita Solar” which runs on a combination of human waste and cow manure and another that uses the tunnel design run on cow manure.  We would like to come up for a design that could be used in the households of Sabana Grande.  Few people have access to large quantities of either cow or pig manure.  We would like the design to be an affordable alternative to cooking with firewood.  The initial installation of the system should cost no more than US$200 and should use materials locally available.  Fuel to be added to the biodiogester should be on a par of what is spent weekly in firewood consumption (approximately US$3) so that this can be a viable alternative.

Próximos pasos: To determine if this is a viable project.

--

My research: 

Here is a picture of the biodigestor, located in the Casita Solar, which is the restaurant built by the Women of Totogalpa (see above description). He is loading cow manure into it, and I assume it's the brick on the group. Look, you can see the solar panels in the background! Here is a website, where they also describe the new project of generating portable solar cookers, which also seem to rely on wood. Note that the solar cookers have to be sturdy enough to cook coffee, jams, and other restaurant foods... (pic also comes from the above link)



Biodigestors can be very simple systems; essentially, you put the excrement (animal or human) into a tank, which does not have much airflow and is warm. You'll get methane gas (you can take it out of a pipe for cooking) and fertilizer due to the anaerobic bacteria digestion. If placed underground, it can be used year round, and the more complicated systems store the gas for when it needs to be used. They can be built with less than $100 with a tank and some inner tubes, and are being used increasingly in developing countries. [4]

[4] http://www.slideshare.net/raddieman/an-introduction-to-biodigestors

My questions: this sounds wonderful. I'd like to learn more about how to construct a biodigestor, what kind of scale they can be operated on, what are their drawbacks, and what are the women currently using in their restaurant. 


LSI in Indonesia
V) identify appropriate water purification for villagers in West Sumatra, Indonesia, including determining how to reach scale.


--

My research:

The LSI Group is a consulting firm based in the US, but focused on facilitating client collaboration, research, and expert advice to companies and organizations in Southeast Asia and Indonesia.[5]

I'm having a very hard time finding specific information on the West Sumatra water purification project. The original document (above) indicates that many  people are involved in this project: the LSI Group (playing a coordinating role, I think), Padang universities, US teams, elders from the villages and the government. 

West Sumatra has had several lack of potable water problems in the past, due to earthquakes.[6] The government has also made it a goal to increase potable water [7]

The document (above) says that solar stills  and solar ultraviolet water distillation are being used on a small scale. [6] mentions the use of electric pumps to provide access to clean water.

[5] http://lsigroup.org/index.php/2012/05/lsigroup/ 
[6] http://www.irinnews.org/Report/86544/INDONESIA-Diseases-strike-West-Sumatra-quake-survivors
[7] http://www.antarasumbar.com/eng/news/provinsi/d/1/10836/west-sumatra-develop-drinking-water-treatment-systems.html

My questions: where is this information online? How have they achieved all of this collaboration within the community? Why haven't the small-scale solutions been scaled up? Why are so many organizations involved in this, and what areas are they working on? 

------------------------

Create a Pugh chart comparing the different projects, and provide me in your blog with a ranked list of the projects you would like to work on.

Solar Biodigestor Solar Cooker Stand Water Purification
My Interest 1 1 0
Time to make Progress 1 2 1
Information Available on Community 1 1 0
Information Available on Solutions 1 1 1
Engineering focus 1 1 1
Collaboration available 1 1 2
Understand Language Spoken 1 1 0
Women/Men Ratio 1 1 0
US Involvement 1 1 2
Previous Progress Made 1 2 2
--------

Ranked List of Projects:

1. Solar Cooker Stand
2. Solar Biodigestor (pretty equal with the solar cooker stand)
3. Bicycle-Powered Blender
4. LCI Indonesia
5. LED lights
5. Wellesley greenhouses

Saturday, March 23, 2013

Cook Stove

Hello!

For the past several weeks, we were in the process of building a cookstove that could be constructed in Guatemala. The women there need a charcoal-burning stove with reduced particle and smoke output. To do this, we needed to improve insulation and smoke control from the sheet-metal stove already put in place. We were to use materials that were cheap and locally manufactured.

2/25: design reviews for your original sketches. Start sketch models. Sheet metal intro.

To begin constructing our cookstove, we did research on what cookstoves had already been constructed. The research is presented below.

After, we went into the shop, and Estuardo taught us about the machines so that we could drill, cut, bend, and connect sheet metal.



Goals:

_improve insulation and smoke control
_low cost and local manufacture

----

Considerations:

materials: scrap metal and insulation material  (clay/ceramic): http://www.cookstove.net/local-resource/material.html

components: handles, chimney? (http://www.cookstove.net/safety-health/index.html)
2 grates, furnace (air flow), insulation (ceramic)

size: using charcoal briquettes, pan/pot size

---

Our device:

. Used outside (that means we don’t have to worry about inhaling particulate matter). So, standalone. [don’t incorporate into pre-existing stovetime design (wrong diameter, also particular matter going up)].

. Use standalone device (especially if outside).

---

To do:

Create a few designs

Make a priorities table and evaluate between them

---


Websites:
aprovecho.org

different types of stoves (pictures at bottom): (2nd pdf down): http://www.aprovecho.org/lab/pubs/rl/charcoal-stoves/category/34

cookstove.net

_enviorofit has the best charcoal stove, $50
_ghana stove (is the older version of the uganda stove)
_uganda stove (http://www.hedon.info/BP29_HouseholdEnergyActivitiesInUganda) : produced by Loyola: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gQmOl2e-vQ … made of clay and scrap metal
_thailand bucket


-----

Envirofit:


Much better idea of how to use it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gUvgBw9jVI


So it’s used outside, and you need matches and charcoal and paper. It stands on its own, and you can adjust the fire.

Note: there are three grates here. From bottom to top, I’m saying grey grate, silver grate, and black grate.

The vents are are on the bottom, and adjustable. Then there’s a grey metal grate with airholes. The charcoal sits on top of the first silver grate, and ashes fall through onto the metal grate. Then there’s a black metal grate on top. Everything’s contained in one enclosed pot, so the warmth is insulated.

Easy to clean.

---

Uganda Stove: http://www.hedon.info/BP29_HouseholdEnergyActivitiesInUganda

Traditional stoves

...The other stove which is common in the urban areas is the Uganda traditional sigiri. This is a metal charcoal stove similar to the metal Mbaula found in Malawi. It is made of scrap sheet metal obtained from discarded motor vehicles or used bitumen drums. This is a one-pot charcoal stove and is made in many sizes. The Uganda traditional metal 'sigiri' is made by artisans who are found in all the urban areas of the country. This type of stove is inefficient and wastes a lot of charcoal. The stove is portable and uses about 600g of charcoal at a time. Its production dates back to the turn of the century. Most of the Ugandan urban households which use charcoal own this type of stove.
Fig 1 - Sigiri Stove


There are three organizations working on improved cookstoves, all essentially of the same design. This is mainly improved by the addition of ceramics for insulation.
Fig 2 - Usika Charcoal Stove

---

Thailand Bucket http://www.nzdl.org/gsdlmod?e=d-00000-00---off-0fnl2.2--00-0----0-10-0---0---0direct-10---4-------0-1l--11-en-50---20-about---00-0-1-00-0--4----0-0-11-10-0utfZz-8-00&a=d&cl=CL3.28&d=HASH018a1dce7bcc8cf7c408b109.19

Types of Biomass Household Cooking Stoves Used by Rural Families in Thailand
Construction
The stove body and grate are made from a clay/rice-husk ash mixture formed in moulds. After the preliminary moulding they are finished by hand, dried and fired. They are then put in a metal bucket with a protective insulation between the stove body and bucket. The stove is portable and new grates can easily be purchased and installed.

FIGURE
Use of the Stove
The charcoal is lit with kindling and after two to three minutes the charcoal bed is burning and the pot can be put in place. The insulating layer reduces heat loss and keeps the charcoal bed very hot. The chamber only needs to be partially refilled to maintain maximum output. Closing the air inlet door will reduce the burning rate considerably. Left-over charcoal can be retrieved at the end of cooking by putting it into a covered jar or a sand pit to extinguish it.

FIGURE

Specific features of efficient charcoal stove


2/21 Plans:




Potential insulators:
Cellulose (grown in Nicaragua)

Design #2!

Amount of sheet metal we’ll need...

exterior box...91 in by 15 inches... 1365 in^2

each grate: 24 x 22 (x3) = 1584 in^2

t-rods... 15in x4 (x4) = 240 in^2

1365+1584+240 = 3189 = 22 ft^2 worth of sheet metal..

Aluminum sheet comes in 3x3, and is $22... so that’s 9 ft^2, so like 3 of those should be plenty, and we could sort of get by with 2. So, $66.

---

Different kinds of insulation: (http://www.appropedia.org/Improved_solid_biofuel_stoves#Improved_cook_stove_materials)

Ceramic tiles

9http://www.homedepot.com/p/t/203223650?catalogId=10053&langId=-1&keyword=ceramic+brick&storeId=10051&N=5yc1v&R=203223650#.UTFhqI5_b50

Mud brick
https://www.engineeringforchange.org/news/2012/04/19/improving_the_improved_cookstoves_standards_test_centers_and_tips.html



In the end, we decided to make a stove based on the envirofit model. Images are shown below. 







We initially ordered aluminum sheet metal, ceramic tile, and a long hinge that we didn't end up using. 


1. Three 3x3 sheets of aluminum sheet metal: $66. Purpose: structure of containers. Any sheet metal that doesn't burn will work. 


(Calculations:

exterior box...91 in by 15 inches... 1365 in^2;
each grate: 24 x 22 (x3) = 1584 in^2;
t-rods... 15in x4 (x4) = 240 in^2
1365+1584+240 = 3189 = 22 ft^2 worth of sheet metal..)

2. Three 12inx12in ceramic tiles: $9. Purpose: cheap insulation, fire proof. 


3. Long hinge. $9. Purpose: connecting outer grate to external box. I have no idea how to construct a hinge, and I can't remember how the Ghana stove did it (and can't find it online.)




Then, after attempting to create a frame with the thin sheet metal, we realized we needed thicker sheet metal, and bought 1/4 in sheet metal. We used this for our frame. 

Our model was originally many parts, because then each of the grates (there were two) could be adjusted based on the style of cooking. We decided that that would mean too many parts and excessive complications, so we made the inner frame non-adjustable, and then we had three parts (the outer box for insulation, the inner frame, and the upper grate). Prof. Banzaert told us that it would be better if we could reduce the amount of parts, so we connected the top grate to the outer box. Thus, we finished with two parts, the outer box, and the inner frame (though the upper grate was removable.)


2/28: design reviews for your sketch models. Start to build.

Our greatest challenge in building was realizing the aluminum sheet metal wouldn't be strong enough to support the pot. We solved this problem by using the chicken wire from another group. If we had not had this available, our grates would have collapsed from beneath the weight of the charcoal and pot. 

We spent a lot of time planning dimensions, and from there a lot of time measuring and cutting. It was very successful because of the time we had taken to make the dimensions how we wished them to be. 

Because we had ceramic tiles that were 12 inches, our box ended up being 12 inches because the tiles would have been almost impossible to cut. The dimensions of the rest of the box and frame emerged from this basic parameter. 

We constructed the bottom grate out of two sheets of metal, which were riveted together. The second and top grates were chicken wire, with sheet metal woven in that we could use to rivet to the outer frame, which was made of heavier metal. 

We constructed the outer box on the first day, making sure the dimensions of the sheet metal surrounding the ceramic tiles were correct. It barely was, so that the tiles stuck very tightly into the box. This was a good thing, since we then didn't need to use adhesive. In Guatemala, it would be expected that their ceramic was made out of a mold, or that they would press clay into the sides of the box. 

3/4, 3/7: continue building, testing, probable field trip one day.

Our main building process was to measure and mark metal, cut it, bend it, and do a lot of riveting. It was a rather smooth process, and we only had to come in outside of class for an hour. It was also smooth because we divided the work fairly evenly after our initial group work with the outer box. Because we had spent so much time planning together, it was pretty easy to work by ourselves on the actual building process. Estuardo was very useful in aiding us in the construction process. 

3/11: final testing, final design review.

Our stove didn't end up boiling water (it turned out to be pretty open on top, and the wind didn't help), but the water was bathwater temperature, which wasn't bad. We had hoped that the increased insulation and improved design (the hallmarks of the envirofit design) would reduce airborn pollution, but this didn't turn out to be the case. Our pot was black by the end of the fire. We meant our pot to be used outside, but we didn't have a good grasp of how to reduce emissions, besides copy the envirofit design. It was difficult to discern the exact reasons for why the envirofit design reduced emissions, because that information wasn't available online. In the future, we should find out exactly why it was effective. We also should have considered that our design was more open than that of the envirofit (because of the constraints of using square ceramic tiles) so that mitigated the beneficial effects. We could have used a more obvious method to reduce pollution, like make a tunnel like one of the other groups did. The overall problem for all of the stoves seemed to be an incomplete grasp of WHY all of the example stoves reduced emissions. 

--

See resources for some useful links.  Remember the basic design process discussed in class:
  • Define the Problem
In defining the problem, we probably placed less emphasis on emissions than we should have, because we didn't understand the problem. Nevertheless, our stove wasn't terrible in final design, as it had good airflow, strong grates, and was easy to clean and use. It was a bit rickety because it contained an inner structure that was removable, but we liked the outer box sheltering the inner structure design. 
  • Develop Concepts
We placed emphasis on low cost and manufacture (we were able to construct it fairly quickly and cheaply, which is a good sign), and in modeling the envirofit design with good insulation and airflow. 
  • System-level Design
  • Detail Design
  • Testing & Refinement
A lot of decisions were made along the way, and I enjoyed how it was a flexible process. Overall, however, we stuck pretty closely with our original design. If we were to work on this stove in the future, we would need to have multiple versions of the stove instead of basically sticking with our original concept. 

all of which probably require:

  • research
  • brainstorming
  • selection (Pugh Chart)
  • prototyping
We made a cardboard version of our box before we constructed the metal version. For the metal version, we added a central metal frame that was different from the envirofit and our original design. 
  • experimentation
  • evaluation
---

pics from the final day: Roshan, me, and Melody. We had our stove stuck on logs, but our original concept was to use bricks.